The Grand Editing Contest Results
The Editing Contest for Overused Words and Phrases, etc. is
over.
All the results are in and have been officially tabulated and confirmed
by Price, Waterhouse.
Ladies and Gentlemen, please fasten your seatbelts, and let’s
have a dramatic drumroll and drumstick.
- The First Prize Winner is . . . Zada Kent!
- The Second Prize Winner is . . . Zada Kent!
- The Third Prize Winner is . . . Zada Kent!
Now you’re probably wondering how one person managed to win
all three prizes, especially since the results specifically state a person can
only enter the contest once. Well, the answer is very simple. There was only
ONE participant in this writer’s contest. Zada submitted a very thoughtful,
intelligent edit of the page from my novel, and she deserves to be the Grand
Prize Winner. Of course, she doesn’t win First, Second, and Third Prize. Gosh,
I was just having a little fun. But according to the rules, she does win First
Prize, which entitles her to select any three of my MuseItUp books in the
format of her choice. Her choices are (in order) “The Blue of Her Hair, the
Gold of Her Eyes,” the winner of Preditors and Editors 2010 Annual Readers
Poll; the novel Dark Wizard; and the extremely dark and perverted “Wet
Dreams.” I am delighted to send them to her, along with my congratulations.
And now for the answers. Please follow along with the rough
page from the first draft of my novel, bearing in mind there is a certain
amount of subjectivity in editing, and editors will differ on precise edits.
Also, I have to confess I inserted some extra repetitions to make this page
more of a test. Okay, scribblers, here we go:
1. Most obvious, at least to me:
there are too many “that’s” on the page, a total of SEVEN of them. Folks, if
this is one page, and your novel is 300 pages long, you could have a total of
2,100 “that’s.” Assuming half of them are superfluous, then you have at least
1,000 too many.
Paragraph seven – “I don’t think that you’re going .
. .” Just remove the “that.” Paragraph eight – “There’s something that I’d like
to know . . .” Remove “that” again. (Save words, make it tighter.) Paragraph
twelve – I changed “That small?” to “So small?” (Use a little variety.) Paragraph
fourteen – I shortened “That’s amazing!” to “Amazing!” Then I recast the next
sentence to eliminate not one but two “that’s.” Thus: “You know, it reminds me
of a Greek myth involving Zeus.” Since “that” is a necessary word, there’s
little danger it will vanish from my novel, and by pruning it, I not only
tighten my prose, but find a way to vary it.
2. Without going into detail, I
use “like” on four occasions. Check it out yourselves. Are all those times
necessary?
3. Even repeating myself twice
may be questionable, especially if it involves using the same word close
together. Zada, for instance, points out I use “gazed” in the fifth paragraph
and “gazed at” in the sixth. On the other hand, I don’t believe repeating the
words “Make love” in the second and third paragraphs are a defect because it’s
obviously done for a specific purpose. However, is it really necessary for both
Turtan and Yaneta to “pause” at different points on the page?
4. Last, there are similar or
repetitive phrases which probably need revision. Yaneta “swept her gaze over
him,” and “He swept his eyes over her body” (paragraphs 5 and 10). Turtan says
“Just a moment” not once but twice (see if you can find them.)
How harmful are such invisible defects? Obviously, some are
more serious than others, especially if they become visible and detract and
distract from our story, our plot, our characters, and also, our language. The
competition for elite markets and publishers is hard enough without making it
harder for ourselves by sabotaging a fine manuscript with words and phrases
we’ve used so often they’ve become second nature. So use your Find, your
Find and Replace tools, train yourself to recognize such
offenses, and good luck in your editing!
Labels: contest, editing, Inspector of the Cross, John B Rosenman, MuseItUp books